pharmacology journal

Volume 11 Issue 5

Impact of Intraoperative Opioid Use and a Combined Anesthesia Regimen in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in a Single-Center Cohort

Julian Marcon,Robert Bischoff,Kaspar Rattenhuber,Michael Chaloupka,Darjusch Askari,Jan-Friedrich Jokisch,Armin J. Becker,Paulo L. Pfitzinger,Patrick Keller,Elena Berg,Christian G. Stief,Daniel Siegl,Christian Kowalski,Alexander Buchner,Nikolaos Pyrgidis andPhilipp Weinhold

1Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, 12203 Berlin, Germany
2Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
3Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Institute of Active Polymers and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, 14513 Teltow, Germany
4Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
5Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Tirol Kliniken, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
6Division for Digital Medicine and Telehealth, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology (UMIT), 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
7University Hospital of Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1300, 38043 Grenoble, France
 
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
 
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Introduction: Higher intraoperative opioid doses may be associated with worse long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the impact of higher doses of intraoperative opioids and type of anesthesia on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and mortality after RP in a high-volume tertiary center. Methods: All patients underwent RP at our center between 2015 and 2021. The role of major intraoperative opioid agents, such as sufentanil remifentanil, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), as well as the type of anesthesia [total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), versus a combination of TIVA and epidural anesthesia, versus solely epidural anesthesia], was assessed in predicting BCR and survival after RP. Results: A total of 1137 patients who had a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 61–72) were included. Overall, 1062 (93%) patients received TIVA, 37 (3%) received TIVA and epidural anesthesia, and 41 (4%) only epidural anesthesia. At a median follow-up of 431 days (interquartile range: 381–639) from RP, 257 (24%) patients developed a BCR. Accordingly, at a median follow-up of 500 days (interquartile range: 450–750), 33 (2.9%) patients died. The type of anesthesia, as well as the dosage or type of the selected intraoperative opioid agents, did not affect either BCR or long-term overall survival. Conclusions: These findings suggest that intraoperative opioid application during RP has no negative oncological impact in the short and long term in patients with localized prostate cancer. Accordingly, combined TIVA and epidural anesthesia, as well as solely epidural anesthesia were associated with similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to TIVA.
Keywords: prostate cancerprostatectomyoverall survivalopioids
Scroll to Top